Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Dream Home
It is tough to find your dream home.
I grew up fairly well off and I became one of those kids who wistfully follows my interests through life because I never learned a sense of practicality. After all, nice homes and long resort vacations to Honolulu were just part of life, right? If things just work out that way, why don't I try my hand at whimsical tales of horror fiction? It just seems soooooo fulfilling. I mean, who'd ever toil in drudgery when they can simply follow their muses through the fields of wonder.
Things changed once my childhood started to end. My parents separated, my family lost our childhood home, my dad lost his business, my mom lost her job in the recession, we lost our home in California, and things just got really sucky for a bunch of years. I'm sure people who had it worse than I did feel a certain sense of schadenfreude from our problems and I will always acknowledge how fortunate we were when I was very young, but it sucked. It really really sucked.
It was tough for me to adapt once things started to change. Suddenly there were elements in my life I couldn't take for granted anymore and I had to figure out a way to make good things happen. It's been tough, though. I have lived in a procession of tiny, communal spaces. Some were good, some weren't, but I'd still love to have a place to call my own.
I probably wouldn't murder people to get it, though.
Dream Home starts with one of the most graphic and horrifying murders I've ever seen committed to film. The killer is a meek bank employee, the victim is a security guard in a posh high rise. After killing the guard, she kills the security camera feed and massacres her way through the office complex. Her motive? Lower the property values enough that she can afford to buy a home there.
The film switches back and forth between the killer's day-to-day life and the night of her big murder spree. As a killer she's a a brutal pitiless monster, but I was never completely off her side. Part of it is due to actor Josie Ho's portrayal of the character's vulnerability. Cheng Lai-sheung is smart and ambitious but she simply doesn't have the means to get what she wants. Her coworkers fritter away money on hedonistic trips to Kabukichō but she saves every penny, works two jobs, and takes care of her ailing father. She's doing exactly what you're supposed to do to succeed but she never gets anywhere.
We get the sense that Cheng has been run over her entire life. Her family was evicted from her childhood home by Triad thugs so developers could build high priced condos, her mother died too young, her father stubbornly refuses to take care of himself, and her coworkers are pushy and unambitious. Even her love life is a hot mess. The most heartbreaking scene in the movie is her liaison with her married boyfriend. She rents a hotel room on an hourly rate and picks up dessert for the two of them. They sleep together, he sneaks away in the morning, and she finds out that he stuck her with the other half of the hotel bill. The final image of the scene is her on the ferry ride home, eating both desserts.
Cities can be very lonely places and Dream Home portrays Hong Kong as cramped, unaffordable, and ugly. In those circumstances, who wouldn't dream of something better?
As sympathetic as I was to Cheng's plight, I have never rooted for slasher victims harder.
The violence in Dream Home is somewhere between parodied and sickening. It's not a typical slasher movie where people shut down immediately after being attacked. They crawl and beg for mercy but she dispatches them with merciless efficiency. I did like the blue-collar implications of her using tools from her construction worker father's tool belt, but it means that people need a few whacks from a sledgehammer before they expire. It's ugly work.
I'm told that there were some behind-the-camera arguments between actress/producer Josie Ho and director Pang Ho-cheung about how farcical they wanted the violence to be and the end result falls somewhere in the middle. It's graphic and most of the people don't really have it coming. Asian horror tends to do squicky violence really well and I liked the counterbalance between Cheng's quiet life and the crimes she committed.
Dream Home is very much an economic horror film. The recent financial crisis plays a big part of the backdrop of the movie and it's a tale of haves and have-nots. In that way, it's more relatable than a lot of horror films with more esoteric subject matter. I'm not afraid of vampires or being possessed by the devil. I am afraid of being broke as fuck forever. I'm afraid of my student loans, I'm afraid of my career path leading me to destitution, I'm afraid of struggling to live in places that I love and never getting anywhere.
I want a place to call my own. I want something comfortable, with a beautiful view and an interesting neighborhood, where people I love are near me and I can feel safe.
I'm not saying I agree with what Cheng Lai-sheung did. But I understand.
Labels:
Asia,
China,
Dream Home,
Economy,
Hong Kong,
Josie Ho,
Pang Ho-cheung,
Review,
Slasher
Monday, January 21, 2013
The Crow
I've seen The Crow so many times that I never need to watch it again. I've internalized it. It's a part of me.
It is a beautiful film. There isn't anything like it, beyond Alex Proyas' follow up Dark City. It also carries an extra edge because the film's star, Brandon Lee, died making it in a horrific shooting accident. Fourteen-year-old me was a martial arts movie nut. I'd been studying shotokan karate for a year or two and I became one of those white kids who wore Bruce Lee tee-shirts. I'd seen Brandon Lee's big premiere Rapid Fire and I was excited to see what else he could do. I was devastated when I heard what happened. I bought every magazine covering the story, from People Magazine to Black Belt, and I devoured every scrap of information on what happened, as if information could provide control over grief. By the end, I came to the conclusion that it was a dislodged shell casing propelled by the gunpowder from a blank, plus it was the dark juju from a film featuring such dark subject matter, plus it was the secret masters of the martial arts world getting revenge on the Lee family for Bruce introducing martial arts secrets to the world.
The Crow came along during the right time of my life. I was really into horror and the occult. I was creeping into my goth phase. I had a headful of fairy tales, an angsty heart, no sense of scale or irony, and a mean streak fused with an adolescent's desperate desire to be loved.
The movie is a fairy tale. After a couple are murdered for nebulous reasons involving fighting tenant evictions and slum lords, the boyfriend comes back as a half-insane revenant. Guided by his spirit-crow, he butchers his assailants more-or-less effortlessly before returning to the grave with his angelic girlfriend. It's a story of True Love. Eric and Shelly are Meant To Be Together and they can't rest until he Puts The Wrong Things Right.
I'm not entirely sure when the film is supposed to take place but I assume it's one of those five minutes in the future kind of things. The Detroit in the film can't exist in real life. It's always night and the city is almost pure obsidian. Everything is wet and dirty and broken. The people are either junkies or sociopathic thrill killers or Ernie Hudson. The crime lord behind it all reminds me less of Scarface and more of the myth-speaking douchey yoga teachers in my neighborhood. In other words, it's stylized beyond reality. It creates a world of its own and works brilliantly within its own context. In a weird way, The Crow is an inversion of the Warren Beatty film Dick Tracy, which is another neo-noir set in its own unique world.
It's impossible not to be on Eric Draven's side. He's a walking raw nerve. He can brutalize a corrupt pawn broker and heal a junkie's poisoned body. He's pain and rage and empathy incarnate. At his most insane, he reminds me of Heath Ledger's performance as the Joker. There's a scene where Draven interrupts a gang meeting looking for his last victim. When the Amazing Interracial Gang cut him in two, he recovers and massacres the room to My Life With The Thrill Kill Kult's song "After The Flesh." Midway through the massacre he stops, picks up a sword, and says "you're all going to die" in a dead man's ice-cold voice. It thrilled me in a way I can only describe as visceral.
Yet, as influential as the movie was to my younger self, I I think I outgrew it.
The big issue I have with the movie is the whole idea of True Love. Eric and Shelly were perfect in every way. We see less than five minutes of their entire relationship and it consists of them being adorable, her smiling down on him like an angel, and the pair of them goofing around with masks and burned food. We never see them disagree or doubt or fight. In other words, we never see them act like two human beings in a real relationship. These days, I think it's interesting how we never really learn anything about Shelly. She's a cypher. She exists to be perfect, to be raped and murdered, and to be the ideal that inspires an ultimately horrible massacre. She isn't a person, she's a statue on a pedestal.
I don't have a lot of patience for avengers these days. There's always something patriarchal about them. You sullied my woman/family and took them away from me, so I have a man's right to do whatever horrible thing I want to in order to avenge it. I'm also too old for fairy tales. I'm too old for simplicity. "True love" doesn't exist. Real love is lumpy and complicated and painful because people are lumpy and complicated and painful, but there's an authentic beauty in that fragility. It has more weight because it has more humanity.
If I were rewriting the screenplay of The Crow, I'd make it abundantly clear that it wasn't Eric Draven running around in the tragedy mask. Eric Draven remains moldering in the ground. The thing moving through the city butchering people is an idea, a figment, and it commits atrocity because it's a broken thing created by pain. In other words, it's a slightly more noble version of the girl from The Ring.
I am looking forward to the remake, if it ever actually comes into being. There's a lot of meat on these bones. Grief and anger are central human emotions and, in many ways, The Crow is one of the purer revenge stories. Because Eric Draven is unliving and insane, he is Vengeance Incarnate. There's a line in the comic that always stuck with me (yeah, I know the comic is significantly different) where he asks a person if he sees Eric's smile. It's sad and evil. Sad because he's utterly alone. Evil because he's dead and he still moves. You see? A dead man visits you.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Issei Sagawa: Real Life Cannibal
(Long time readers: This is part of a class assignment on real life psychos. I've never really liked covering True Crime stuff because I have a very different emotional reaction to real world violence as opposed to fictitious violence. Still, I think it's an interesting story and I get to talk a little about how psychos work in fiction vs. in real life. Enjoy!)
Issei Sagawa killed and consumed a woman and never went to
jail for it. He lives in a small Japanese town writing books and making art and
generally not bothering anyone. I don't know if he is actually insane and doubt
he's much of a threat anymore but there's something both pitiable and monstrous
about him.
Sagawa was born in 1949 to a wealthy family in Kobe, Japan.
Despite the fact that he looked pretty much like a normal guy, he described
himself as being frail, underformed, and sickly, which made me wonder if he had
some sort of body dysmorphia issues at the root of all his psychosis. He grew
fixated on western women as they represented an inversion of his self-image. As
he said in his Vice interview, “I am weak and short. Western women are tall and
beautiful.”
He also became sexually fixated on the idea of cannibalism.
It's not apparently an unheard of fetish and there are videos out there of people eating human-shaped candies and describing devouring life and gaining strength from it. I suspect that Sagawa shares this fetish and he took it as far as
a person can possibly go.
After a couple brushes with the law, including an attempted
rape charge, Sagawa left Japan at 28 to study comparative literature at the
Sorbonne. As I was putting my research material together, I found myself
impressed by the man as I flipped through his photos from his time in Paris. He
looked like the kind of smart, well-dressed, confident young man who would wind
up in Paris studying Truth and Beauty. I was impressed and a little bit jealous
of the romanticism of his life at that point.
On June 11th 1981, Sagawa invited a Dutch student named
Renée Hartevelt to his apartment under the pretext of translating some German
poems. As she was seated in a chair, Sagawa shot her in the back of the head
with a small-caliber rifle. After she died, Sagawa raped her and began eating
her body.
The thing that trips me out about the scenario is that it
sounds like he had a shot with her. Come on, son. No one goes to some dude's
house just to translate poetry. The point where cognitive
dissonance kicks in for me is here. Sagawa was clearly into her and it seems
like he had a shot. At that point my instinct would be to pour a couple drinks
and ask about her major but his thought process was all "kill, fuck, eat."
That, my friends, is messed up.
Anyway, he carves and eats parts of her body. It's pretty
gross and I'll spare y'all the details, but suffice to say he gets worried that
the smell of rotting meat will be noticed so he carves the body up, packs it in
a couple suitcases, and take them to a nearby lake for disposal. He's caught,
the police arrest him, and he's quickly ruled insane. The French populace are
outraged at the case and there's some debate about what to do with Sagawa.
Before treatment even starts for Sagawa, the Japanese government step in and
extradite him back to Japan. For reasons I'm not entirely clear on, the
Japanese psychologists assigned to his case declare him "sane but
evil" and let him go. Aside from a couple kerfluffles, he's been a free man
ever since.
Sagawa has created a sort of cottage industry out of being a
celebrity cannibal. During the interview I watched with him, the camera cut
between whimsical drawings he drew to recreate the crime with photos of
Hartevelt's dismembered body. He's written books, acted in bizarre films,
created a repellent manga, and appears to have exploited his behavior into a
tidy living.
The structure of the interview both demonizes and humanizes
him. On one hand, he's a creepy little troll who ate a woman, makes money off
the crime, holds no real regret, and works out of an office where he keeps
photos of Hartevelt's body in cute little frames on his desk. On the other
hand, he's a lonely little outcast who longs for death, has no self-esteem, and
has been pretty ruthlessly exploited by the people who've come into his life
since he returned to Japan. The few TV shows he's done make him look less like
a monster and more as a man uncomfortable in his own skin and desperately seeking
approval. A couple of cute German backpackers traveled around the world on
Sagawa's dime, likely by exploiting his obvious attraction to them. The
weirdest moment in Sagawa's post-cannibal life is his turn as a pornographic
star. Some dirtbag pornographer hired a porn starlet to sleep with Sagawa on
film The girl had no idea who Sagawa was before performing on-camera. After the
act was over, the pornographer had Sagawa show her the photos from his crime
and explain what he'd done. You can see the girl crumbling in horror at the
revelation. The pornographer interviews the tearful girl in the car afterward
and she says “I understand that he’s full of insecurities. I think it’s selfish
to let his fantasies grow so wild. Or it’s like he’s lacking something.”
I chose Issei Sagawa for a couple reasons. Leaving aside the
obvious fact that I'm a total weeaboo geek, I was fascinated by a guy who
committed probably the biggest taboo in modern culture and suffered no real
punishment.
I also chose Sagawa because of how candid he is with his
internal life. Because he has his liberty and because so much of his life
involves fixating on himself, he hasn't developed all those weird power
fantasies other killers develop when they're left to rot in prison. He's
intelligent and articulate and more than a little bit sad, but when I found
myself being lulled into sympathy for him he would say or show something
horrible and remind you that the would would probably best be rid of him. In
other words, he's not a cardboard cut out fictional psycho but a nuanced and
deeply broken human being.
I also chose him because of the overtly sexual nature of his
crimes. Maybe it's my own prejudices but I tend to see almost all serial murder
as behavior of a corrupted sexuality. There's a reason killers target people
they're attracted to and a reason that most of the crime involve either
dominance or rape. People destroy what they want to fuck because they hate
anything that makes them feel lust because they hate themselves for being
unable to approach the person in a meaningful way. It's really just the logical
extreme extension of the typical misogyny you see every time some dude talks
shit about some girl.
Serial killers who kill just
because
are slasher movie villains. That's fine, I like a good
slasher flick as much as the next malformed child of the 80s, but they aren't
proper psychos. I believe that in a healthy, socially supportive society,
people who kill other people for reasons other than profit or temporary rage
are fundamentally aberrant. They're broken, usually by a combination of
chemistry and circumstance. It's easy and perhaps morally correct to simply
want to toss them down a deep dark hole and forget about them, but I tend to
see psychos as extreme extensions of toxic social attitudes we all buy into. A
sad little fetishist who fixates his sexuality on cannibalism the way that
Sagawa does is an interesting, if depressing, mirror held up to the darker
sides of human sexuality.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Batman: The Killing Joke by Alan Moore and Brian Bolland
I found my copy of The Killing Joke among my dead brother's things.
I don't know if I loaned it to him and never asked for it back or if it was a copy he bought during one of the comic cons I dragged him to. It was one of the few things I gave him to try that he liked. He was never going to be the pop culture junkie I was....pop geekdom requires a certain level of uninhibited enthusiasm and Dominic Borrelli was an eye-roller if ever there was one....but V For Vendetta resonated with his mid-college angry Green party mentality. Burn down this corrupt world and the poisoned systems that supported it! I loaned him my copy of V For Vendetta and when he was done with it I said hey, you liked that one. Well, Alan Moore wrote another story about a maniac. Maybe you'd enjoy it.
He didn't have many other graphic novels. He didn't have much of anything. They say that suicides give away things they own before they kill themselves but my brother never exactly hoarded the way I did. I have a comic collection that's thousands deep, folios full of obscure yakuza/kung-fu/horror movies, artwork, posters, toys, collectibles, and all the other petty crap of a guy with the attention span of a hummingbird. My brother liked big things. He pissed away a lot of money on a souped up car during his Import Tuner phase and his laptop could probably give navigation assistance to space ships. Beyond that, he owned very little. He had an almost Buddhalike detachment from the material world. Had his story not shaken out the way it did, I would have found that trait admirable.
It's corny to say this but I was into the Joker long before he got popular.
I'm writing this while looking at a tiny Joker statue that sits on my desk. He's got his hands up in a ta-daa pose, the consummate showman. We've spent an entire semester talking about maniacs and their grubby little neuroses and the petty ugliness of the horrors they inflict. The Joker is all of those things, but he's also a showman. That dichotomy always drew me to him. Yes, it's probably forced and way too manic-slash-needy, but the guy seems like he's really having a good time.
I've been collecting Joker memorabilia for years. I had a shelf in my old apartment dedicated to all the statues and figures I could collect of him. My ex-girlfriend and my mother used to add little pieces to my collection. It was one of those tiny signs that showed they were paying attention and that they loved me. Give me those small gestures over the operatic melodrama of fictitious love any day.
The Joker is the avatar for my id. I'm drawn to trickster figures, whether they are Coyote or Anansi or kitsune or Bacchus or Dionysus or Bugs Bunny. I like funny, chaotic, life-of-the-party types. Given a choice, I prefer not to live in silence. For me, heaven is an endless party with really good music and hot chicks and drinks on someone else's tab. Give me laughter over silence any day.
Just make sure they have a really good reading couch to nurse hangovers on and read.
******************
I fell in love with the Joker specifically because of The Killing Joke. A junior high school teacher gave me a copy of the book and it sunk in with me.
I grew up during the iron age of comics. All the guys had muscles and knives, all the girls had porn-star breasts, no one wore any clothes, and everything was covered in blood. It was taboo and dramatic and fun and completely mind-blowingly stupid. Because we're a nation of repressed yokels, we equate "mature content" in our story telling with the sensational. People keep telling me that horror is all about the visceral, that everything in my genre is blood and tits. Mature storytelling can take all sorts of subject matter and apply depth and humanity to them
But I digress. Anyway.
The Joker became my avatar when I realized that the only sane response to the world was to laugh. We're stuck on a rock, nobody gives a shit about us, we go to wars over lies, people try to guard the fortress of a king they've never seen or met but all are trained to murder at the first sign of a threat.
The Joker became my avatar when I started growing up, realized that life was unfair and uncaring, and I was going to die and there was nothing waiting for me afterward.
After you figure that stuff out, you've got three options. One, you find a system of lies and you believe in so hard that you ignore that nagging little voice in the back of your mind. Two, you shut down and become a French film student.
Or three, you throw a really good party and keep laughing until the lights go out.
*****************
I talk about my brother a lot.
I go to a siblings of suicide support group. I participate in suicide prevention walks. I slip it into casual conversation. I've had a hard time filtering out the information when I talk to people. It makes people uncomfortable and it tends to dominate the conversation and casts me in the role of Grieving Person but it's hard for me to stop myself. I want to talk about it. If I keep it up, it will become my identity.
I received the class syllabus while I was back in San Francisco, watching him go. I bought all my books at my favorite sci-fi/fantasy/horror bookstore (Dark Carnival in Berkeley, CA. If you're reading this, you should go there. It is to readers what Santa's workshop is to greedy children) and I started hacking through them as quickly as I could. When I saw The Killing Joke among my brother's things, I knew I had some shit to say on it. It was such an important part of my upbringing and I'd had the opportunity to see the work with fresh eyes.
Here's my take on the story: it's not a tale of madness but a tale of mourning.
Both Batman and the Joker are creatures created by grief. Something terrible happened to both of them and they dealt with it different ways. Batman turned his grief inward and turned broody. The Joker projected outward. I don't even think the Joker is particularly crazy. He's flamboyant and evil and comic-book crazy, but the things he done is a natural continuation of the things that happened to him.
******************
My brother was a brooder.
He was introverted and kept to himself, which always mystified me because he was a very handsome young man. I once took him to a friend's party and all these cute hipster girls kept asking me about him. "He's so cute!" they'd tell me and I'd seethe with jealousy and he wouldn't move an inch from the couch and not talk with anyone.
Our relationship was somewhat adversarial. I tortured him throughout his childhood and I spent my adulthood trying to make it up to him. We had a pretty good adult relationship but there was always tension between us. It didn't help that my brother got the bulk of attention. He needed it, obviously, but it felt like I was trusted to just be fine.
I contextualized my relationship using pop culture characters. If he were the selfish, destructive Loki, I was the noble idiot Thor. If he was the too-serious, brooding Batman then I was the loud party boy Joker.
When my brother was in his hospital bed, they encouraged us to play his favorite songs and talk to him. "You never know what they can hear and music helps." So, after a bunch of pandora stations and Hawaiian music and stuff like that, I found one of the cut scenes from the video game Metal Gear Solid. It's about two brothers at war with each other. The dark one is the hero and the loud vibrant one is trying to resurrect the apocalyptic dream of his dead father.
One lived and one died. What does the Joker do without Batman?
The Killing Joke was the first real attempt (as far as I'm aware of) to humanize the Joker.
A lot of smart, serious comic fans complain about the Joker. He's one note. He's an atrocity factory. There's no rhyme or reason to what he does and the trails of bodies that he leaves in his wake is proof-positive that Batman is completely impotent. The best example of this point of view is below:
The Killing Joke is the first and pretty much only attempt to make him anything approaching a real character. Other writers have built on little aspects of this story, but most of their efforts slip into campy angst. During the one moment of lucidity that the Joker has, after he plays the popgun prank on Batman, he's not bemoaning his fate or weeping for the man he once was. He just stands before Batman, resigned and exhausted, asking why Batman doesn't kick the hell out of him for all the things he's done.
The entire scene of Batman reaching out to the Joker takes all of a page and a half. It's short and there's a tremendous amount left unsaid, but it feels authentic and natural in a way that longer speeches would have felt artificial. There's a lot of weariness and dull pain between the two of them and it fills the scene.
Brevity is often the best choice.
****************
There's a lot of people who think that the final pages of the story, where the Joker and Batman are laughing at the same joke about two lunatics striving for salvation, means that Batman is just as crazy as his nemesis. I hate that interpretation. Batman isn't crazy, or at least not in the same way. But he has felt tremendous loss in his own life. That moment of shared humanity allows them to laugh at the absurdity of their situation.
Plus, okay, maybe they're a little nuts.
That, to me, is a better ending to The Killing Joke. We deal with our grief in our own ways. Some brood and go inward, some project and go outward, but either way it changes you.
*****************
No disrespectful comments please.
Friday, November 2, 2012
Joyride by Jack Ketchum
This was the one review I didn’t want to write.
It’s not that I’m going to shit all over Joyride. I can’t
say that the book was a pleasant reading experience but it was undeniably well
done. It’s got prose like a British sitcom, where the camera just stays at one
place and unflinchingly describes the ugliness placed in front of it.
I think I’ve been twitchy about writing this one because
Jack Ketchum is part of the horror orthodoxy. He’s one of those dudes people
just get behind and if I say anything negative I’m afraid
I’ll lose my horror bonafides. It’s not that I have anything particularly
negative to say about the guy other than his work is nearly the textbook
definition of a crapsack world.
Crapsack worlds, as defined by tvtropes.org, is a fictional
universe where everything is absolutely miserable. Usually it refers to a
post-apocalyptic setting and often there are either zombies or robots or
something running around, but Joyride takes place in a
crapsack version of the human condition. Everyone sucks, everyone is poisoned
by hate or madness, and you can murder your abusive husband in cold blood with
your lover and still remain the “hero” of the story.
A lot of horror fiction, especially horror fiction without
any overt supernatural elements, takes place in crapsack worlds. I can’t stand
the tone of these stories. They feel like thinly veiled misanthropy. I don’t
know Jack Ketchum in the way that a lot of people in the program do. For all I
know, he’s a lovely human being who is kind to puppies and dotes over little
old ladies in their hour of need. But it feels like writing from someone who
sees very little light in the human condition.
Which, of course, means that he writes the best overtly
vicious psychopath we’ve encountered in the course of the semester. Up until
this point Francis Dolarhyde has been my favorite looney. He’s kind of a cop
out. He’s easy to like. We feel sad for him, we hope he’s successful in
fighting off the urges of the Red Dragon, and his murders aren’t jammed in our
faces.
Wayne Lock’s mania is jammed right into our faces. We’re not
meant to like him. But he’s brilliantly constructed.
Joyride feels like one of those old EC
Comics morality tales where the scheming couple bumps off the husband, only to
have him riiiiiiise up from the grave to seek vengeance. The story has been
updated and the husband really does have it coming (though, frankly, I saw a
million different ways she could have gotten away without killing the guy) but
instead of the shambling drippy skeleton we get some misogynistic loon with a
grudge against everyone. The basic message remains the same: if you step out of
line, there will be horrible consequences.
**********************
Wayne Lock feels less grandiose than Dolarhyde. He’s less
intelligent and a whole lot more petty and a whole lot more believable. As I
recognized my insecurities in Dolarhyde, I recognize my idiot rages in Lock.
It’s not hard at times to feel like people are against you and there’s reason
to keep track of those grievances. But most of us shrug our shoulders and get
over it. Lock seems like rage writ large, the kind of person with a permanent
‘fuck you’ mentality. It makes sense that he’d become entranced with the
violence he sees. A guy like him builds kill lists as a way to vent, then
discovers how easy it actually is to hurt people if you have no conscious and a
whole lot of entitlement issues.
So he’s a well-designed psycho, but he’s really the only
compelling character in the book. I read it months ago and I don’t remember
anything about the couple, other than the fact that I wasn’t sympathetic toward
them. It’s hard to sell me on cold blooded murderers, no matter how righteous
their cause.
I also thought that the book was really centered around the
climactic massacre. The back cover of the book sold it as a story of two
‘righteous’ murderers who find themselves trapped in a rolling massacre with a
nutjob. That stuff is scary. Some of my favorite tense scenes in movies are the
bits where a crazy person is in the back seat of a car, being half-playful and
half-threatening to the scared people driving. It’s the ultimate hitchhiker
story. That whole hook feels discarded midway through and the story ends in a
gigantic setpiece where the wackadoo goes blasting through the neighborhood
only to get gunned down by Johnny Law. It’s incredibly well-executed (har de
har harrrr….) but it feels like it could be a short story in its own. It fits
what came before but doesn’t necessarily follow, if that makes sense.
**********************
Before I finish this post, I want to stress that I don’t
think this was a bad book. Jack Ketchum is a really, really
good writer and I’ve enjoyed other things he’s written tremendously. I even
“enjoyed” reading Joyride. If just feels like a world view I
can’t particularly subscribe to.
I’ve been grinding through Silent Hill 2
over the past week as I’ve written this. It’s a supernatural story and it’s one
of the scariest things I’ve every encountered, but it’s also a lovely story of
grief and guilt and it takes place in a world where the horror of the
supernatural contrasts the mundane joys and awfulness of regular life.
The crapsack world of a lot of horror fiction is a place
where everything is terrible. Every family is dysfunctional behind closed
doors, the mildest mouse can turn into the biggest monster, and everything is
two hours and a hot meal away from falling apart. It’s the kind of attitude
that feels immature to me. It’s myopic and limited, the world of heavy metal
album covers and sullen teenagers. It’s probably not the effect Ketchum wanted
the reader to take away from the story, but it’s what I pulled from it. Maybe I’m
more interested in what I had to say rather than what the book did.
Labels:
Crime,
Jack Ketchum,
Novel,
Review,
Serial Killer
Friday, October 19, 2012
The Sculptor by Gregory Funaro
I'm writing this one in adverse conditions.
Normally I write my assigned reading reviews waaaaaaay in advance, right after I read the book. I like to get things finished early and come back as discussions occur between my classmates and I find ideas worth stealing. I read The Sculptor months ago and couldn't quite get my mind around it. I knew it had a lot of problems and there were a lot of sour notes, but I couldn't quite a handhold into the discussion.
I haven't really dug into my classmate's opinions on this one, but I gather from the murmurings that this wasn't a popular read. I can't wait to get into their opinions but for now I have to grind out my own. This blog post is due by the end of today and I'm on a train to Albany in three hours. Bad, bad Joe.
Anyway, here's my hook: The Sculptor isn't really a psycho.
****************
It's impossible to do what The Sculptor does if he was actually psychologically disabled.
Dude was organized, efficient, and he had no internal monologue that contradicted with reality. He was sane. He was evil, but he was sane.
He was supernatural. No one can move a 1000 pound murder tableau surreptitiously in the dark, I don't give a shit how big their lats are.
He was kinda like a fan-fic psycho. He had a token ka-raaaaazy back story but he was also obscenely rich and had a gigantic workspace and everything he needed for his kookadook murder parties. And he had perfect "sculpting" technique and medical knowledge and art knowledge and....yeah.
Professor Boss Man said something that stuck with me. This dude is a Batman villain. That's cool. I like Batman, but I recognize that "comic book reality" doesn't really cross over into our own. A character like The Sculptor would make a great Miller-era puzzle for the Dark Knight to solve. He doesn't work in a book attempting to ape the "real world."
****************
What else?
Markham reads less like an FBI agent and more like what a sensitive artist would THINK that a smart FBI agent would be like. Also, his love affair with Cathy Hildebrant would have gotten his ass deservedly fired AND feels like it belongs in one of those corny romance novels where time traveling vikings join the Navy SEALS and fall in love with a woman in the Navy WEALS.
Look it up. It's totally a thing.
Oh, and Cathy Hildebrant. Man, she was kind of an asshole, wasn't she? I mean, dude, it sounds like your husband really was trying make amends and you were merciless towards him. Also, for an art historian, you sound a lot like a male was writing you and changed your character from an angry teamster at the last moment. It didn't help that your husband was the great squandered opportunity of the novel. The author could have said something interesting about marriage and fidelity and forgiveness. It really, really seemed like the dude was trying and the writer undercut it by making him a cad when we got into his point of view.
Also, as a side note. Half Korean, half German? Haaaaawwt. May certain exes of mine never read this post.
Anyway, I did like all the art stuff. I didn't know anything about the art of Michelangelo and he made that shit come alive. Lot of troubles around the edges, though.
Anyway, I'm out.
Peace.
j.
Normally I write my assigned reading reviews waaaaaaay in advance, right after I read the book. I like to get things finished early and come back as discussions occur between my classmates and I find ideas worth stealing. I read The Sculptor months ago and couldn't quite get my mind around it. I knew it had a lot of problems and there were a lot of sour notes, but I couldn't quite a handhold into the discussion.
I haven't really dug into my classmate's opinions on this one, but I gather from the murmurings that this wasn't a popular read. I can't wait to get into their opinions but for now I have to grind out my own. This blog post is due by the end of today and I'm on a train to Albany in three hours. Bad, bad Joe.
Anyway, here's my hook: The Sculptor isn't really a psycho.
****************
It's impossible to do what The Sculptor does if he was actually psychologically disabled.
Dude was organized, efficient, and he had no internal monologue that contradicted with reality. He was sane. He was evil, but he was sane.
He was supernatural. No one can move a 1000 pound murder tableau surreptitiously in the dark, I don't give a shit how big their lats are.
He was kinda like a fan-fic psycho. He had a token ka-raaaaazy back story but he was also obscenely rich and had a gigantic workspace and everything he needed for his kookadook murder parties. And he had perfect "sculpting" technique and medical knowledge and art knowledge and....yeah.
Professor Boss Man said something that stuck with me. This dude is a Batman villain. That's cool. I like Batman, but I recognize that "comic book reality" doesn't really cross over into our own. A character like The Sculptor would make a great Miller-era puzzle for the Dark Knight to solve. He doesn't work in a book attempting to ape the "real world."
****************
What else?
Markham reads less like an FBI agent and more like what a sensitive artist would THINK that a smart FBI agent would be like. Also, his love affair with Cathy Hildebrant would have gotten his ass deservedly fired AND feels like it belongs in one of those corny romance novels where time traveling vikings join the Navy SEALS and fall in love with a woman in the Navy WEALS.
Look it up. It's totally a thing.
Oh, and Cathy Hildebrant. Man, she was kind of an asshole, wasn't she? I mean, dude, it sounds like your husband really was trying make amends and you were merciless towards him. Also, for an art historian, you sound a lot like a male was writing you and changed your character from an angry teamster at the last moment. It didn't help that your husband was the great squandered opportunity of the novel. The author could have said something interesting about marriage and fidelity and forgiveness. It really, really seemed like the dude was trying and the writer undercut it by making him a cad when we got into his point of view.
Also, as a side note. Half Korean, half German? Haaaaawwt. May certain exes of mine never read this post.
Anyway, I did like all the art stuff. I didn't know anything about the art of Michelangelo and he made that shit come alive. Lot of troubles around the edges, though.
Anyway, I'm out.
Peace.
j.
Monday, October 8, 2012
Misery by Stephen King
Of all the books I had to read for class, Misery is the one I felt the most apprehension about.
A story about a psycho running at me with a knife doesn't really rattle my cage. It's a situation that (thankfully) seems so far-fetched to me that I don't get a lot of anxiety over it. Having a conversation with a crazy person who is responsible for your safety is much more frightening.
Reading Misery was an intense experience.
Most of the people who read this blog know me in real life. I have a fairly over-the-top vibe and a big flapping mouth, but I don't actually deal with conflict well. Blame the screaming matches my parents got into as a kid or whatever cheap pop-psychology explanation fits best, but the long and short is that I prefer things to be peaceful. I want to be liked. I try to please. Sometimes that means rolling over and showing my belly.
The reason that I found Misery so stressful was because, if it were me in Paul Sheldon's chair, I would have done everything I could to make Annie Wilkes happy. I would have told her that Misery's death was simply a lead-up to a sequel where she comes back triumphant. I would have shmoozed her, gushed at her enthusiasm, and answered every one of her fan-girl questions with the answers that she wants to hear. Yes, Misery eventually chooses handsome Edward but keeps a special place in her heart for brooding, passionate Jacob. Yes, I will be writing these stories forever (although, come on, what kinda dude's dude writes Regency romances? The way Sheldon comes off, he should have been writing stories with .45s and tits) and I'm sorry that you found the swearing in my new novel so offensive. I'm trying to capture the streets my character comes from. In my next draft I will tone it down and add a modern Misery. Agony Velasquez, maybe.
As I was reading the book, I kept roleplaying what I would have said and how I would have placated her, but the simple answer is that she's unpredictable and crazy and sooner or later I'd have to stop placating her and start being assertive. The threat of death, mixed in with the threat of disappointing a domineering mother figure, rattled me in ways that I'm kind of embarrassed about.
King is a good writer.
It's trendy to trash King for his weird period in the 90s when his books were at the same time too personal and too bloated. It's trendy to talk down about him because the Uneducated Masses really dig him. When I first got to New York City and was struggling to get by, I knew that I could go to any Salvation Army, slap down a dollar, and have entertainment for hours. His stuff is ubiquitous and that means it's taken for granted. He writes about podunk towns and podunk people (snotty snort, eats some cheese), but the man knows how to capture humanity and human weakness. His images stick in the mind.
Having said that, his pulpy Tales From The Crypt roots sometimes work against him.
I gotta lay out the one petty issue I had with the book. It's the same problem I had with Apt Pupil, where the villain went from a small, believable sort of banal evil to an obnoxiously grandiose cackling lunatic. Todd in Apt Pupil starts off as just a teenager taking lessons in sociopathy from an old kook, then goes off and starts hacking up homeless people? No. Annie Wilkes is a mass murderer living in isolation? No.
There's a scene where trapped novelist Paul Sheldon finds Annie Wilkes' scrapbook locked up somewhere. He flips through it and it turns out that she killed enough people to fill a city. It stretches credibility and takes the character to a farcical territory. Given that the horror is so close and intimate, it would have worked better if she was just a lonely woman out in the woods whose identity was so wrapped up in her fictional avatar that she goes nuts.
I understand that people feel Annie Wilkes is a mean-spirited stereotype of the crazy woman or romance readers or obsessive fans of anything in general. Yeah, maybe. But people get weird about the fictitious characters they empathize with.
Guilty.
I gotta close this one out by discussing the circumstances I read this book in.
I'd been hearing about Misery for a long time. Everyone knows about the movie, which I tried to watch but just couldn't finish, and everyone says it's one of King's best tales. It's supposed to be of special significance to writers, too. A hundred years ago, I read an interview with Gothy horror writer Poppy Z. Brite and she said that Misery was one of the best how-to-write manuals she'd ever encountered. I was really looking forward to that aspect of the book. I HATE books on writing but making the mechanics of storytelling a part of the story weaves how writing actually works and impacts a human life. It's a Scheherazade piece and there's something weird about how thrilling the idea of keeping yourself alive by telling stories is.
Telling stories keeps you going. I read Misery right after I lost someone I loved. I didn't want to write. I didn't want to love or fuck or dance or drink or do any of the things that defined my life. I wanted to lash out. I sometimes do, and I sometimes go dancing. Reading Paul Sheldon's story helps me work through my own.
I doubt I'll read this again anytime soon. It was easily the most hairy book I read this semester. I like a good psycho story but I think I'll stick to nice, safe stalk-stalk-knife-knife-misogyny-religion-daddy issues stories. But it was the right thing for me to read at the right time.
A story about a psycho running at me with a knife doesn't really rattle my cage. It's a situation that (thankfully) seems so far-fetched to me that I don't get a lot of anxiety over it. Having a conversation with a crazy person who is responsible for your safety is much more frightening.
Reading Misery was an intense experience.
Most of the people who read this blog know me in real life. I have a fairly over-the-top vibe and a big flapping mouth, but I don't actually deal with conflict well. Blame the screaming matches my parents got into as a kid or whatever cheap pop-psychology explanation fits best, but the long and short is that I prefer things to be peaceful. I want to be liked. I try to please. Sometimes that means rolling over and showing my belly.
The reason that I found Misery so stressful was because, if it were me in Paul Sheldon's chair, I would have done everything I could to make Annie Wilkes happy. I would have told her that Misery's death was simply a lead-up to a sequel where she comes back triumphant. I would have shmoozed her, gushed at her enthusiasm, and answered every one of her fan-girl questions with the answers that she wants to hear. Yes, Misery eventually chooses handsome Edward but keeps a special place in her heart for brooding, passionate Jacob. Yes, I will be writing these stories forever (although, come on, what kinda dude's dude writes Regency romances? The way Sheldon comes off, he should have been writing stories with .45s and tits) and I'm sorry that you found the swearing in my new novel so offensive. I'm trying to capture the streets my character comes from. In my next draft I will tone it down and add a modern Misery. Agony Velasquez, maybe.
As I was reading the book, I kept roleplaying what I would have said and how I would have placated her, but the simple answer is that she's unpredictable and crazy and sooner or later I'd have to stop placating her and start being assertive. The threat of death, mixed in with the threat of disappointing a domineering mother figure, rattled me in ways that I'm kind of embarrassed about.
King is a good writer.
It's trendy to trash King for his weird period in the 90s when his books were at the same time too personal and too bloated. It's trendy to talk down about him because the Uneducated Masses really dig him. When I first got to New York City and was struggling to get by, I knew that I could go to any Salvation Army, slap down a dollar, and have entertainment for hours. His stuff is ubiquitous and that means it's taken for granted. He writes about podunk towns and podunk people (snotty snort, eats some cheese), but the man knows how to capture humanity and human weakness. His images stick in the mind.
Having said that, his pulpy Tales From The Crypt roots sometimes work against him.
I gotta lay out the one petty issue I had with the book. It's the same problem I had with Apt Pupil, where the villain went from a small, believable sort of banal evil to an obnoxiously grandiose cackling lunatic. Todd in Apt Pupil starts off as just a teenager taking lessons in sociopathy from an old kook, then goes off and starts hacking up homeless people? No. Annie Wilkes is a mass murderer living in isolation? No.
There's a scene where trapped novelist Paul Sheldon finds Annie Wilkes' scrapbook locked up somewhere. He flips through it and it turns out that she killed enough people to fill a city. It stretches credibility and takes the character to a farcical territory. Given that the horror is so close and intimate, it would have worked better if she was just a lonely woman out in the woods whose identity was so wrapped up in her fictional avatar that she goes nuts.
I understand that people feel Annie Wilkes is a mean-spirited stereotype of the crazy woman or romance readers or obsessive fans of anything in general. Yeah, maybe. But people get weird about the fictitious characters they empathize with.
Guilty.
I gotta close this one out by discussing the circumstances I read this book in.
I'd been hearing about Misery for a long time. Everyone knows about the movie, which I tried to watch but just couldn't finish, and everyone says it's one of King's best tales. It's supposed to be of special significance to writers, too. A hundred years ago, I read an interview with Gothy horror writer Poppy Z. Brite and she said that Misery was one of the best how-to-write manuals she'd ever encountered. I was really looking forward to that aspect of the book. I HATE books on writing but making the mechanics of storytelling a part of the story weaves how writing actually works and impacts a human life. It's a Scheherazade piece and there's something weird about how thrilling the idea of keeping yourself alive by telling stories is.
Telling stories keeps you going. I read Misery right after I lost someone I loved. I didn't want to write. I didn't want to love or fuck or dance or drink or do any of the things that defined my life. I wanted to lash out. I sometimes do, and I sometimes go dancing. Reading Paul Sheldon's story helps me work through my own.
I doubt I'll read this again anytime soon. It was easily the most hairy book I read this semester. I like a good psycho story but I think I'll stick to nice, safe stalk-stalk-knife-knife-misogyny-religion-daddy issues stories. But it was the right thing for me to read at the right time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






